Connect with us

Politics

The Koch Network was in love with Mike Pence. Now is playing.

Published

on

Art Pope, former president of Americans for Prosperity and a Republican donor in Raleigh, N.C., said the group’s decision to endorse a Trump challenger “was not intended to benefit a specific candidate at this time.” Instead, he said, the goal was to “find the best candidate and, more importantly, the best president of the United States on the issues that Americans stand for in order to prosper.”

Pope, who attended Coach’s weekend meeting earlier this month in Palm Springs, Calif., said he personally believes Pence was “the best fit for that criteria.” But he said the organization would go through an open process to select a candidate.

A spokesperson for the network declined to comment, citing Politico on the note. But according to two Republican advisers close to the network, who were granted anonymity to discuss domestic politics, whether Pence will be Koch’s nominee remains an open question.

Efforts by Pence donors to secure the support of the Koch network underscore the intensification of the 2024 cycle’s shadow primary and the hurdles the former vice president faces as he prepares to jump into a potentially crowded field. Few potential Republican candidates in 2024 can boast closer ties to the Koch network than Pence, which could make the inability to secure her support a setback for him and other candidates who have maintained close ties.

Advertisement

“If the vice president decides to run, he would welcome the support of organizations like the Koch Network who are ideologically aligned with him on issues like taxation, free speech, and personal liberties,” said the Pence adviser.

But Pence is no longer one of the conservative movement’s most visible role models. Instead, he found himself in the midst of a crowded field of philosophically like-minded people. As the Koch network weighs which non-Trump candidate to endorse and give its resources to, it has a range of potential options.

Although Pence has support among some of Koch’s factions, others within the network favor candidates from former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley to Wichita’s Mike Pompeo, a former secretary of state who hails from the same city as Koch’s oil. It is headquartered in -and-gas, which had its support during his congressional campaigns. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is also said to be enjoying some kind of goodwill among donors allied with Koch.

“I don’t know if [the decision to endorse] Totally helps [Pence],” a national Republican consultant familiar with Koch’s network granted anonymity to discuss their knowledge of the political deliberations. “I don’t think it helps one person. I think it will be very difficult for Pence to win. I think it helps everyone who isn’t Trump.” This person added: “Don’t forget there’s a guy named Mike Pompeo who’s very close to the Koch family and he’s from Wichita. There is not a single leader dog now.”

The efforts by Pence donors to secure the support of the Koch network underscore the degree to which the shadow primary of the 2024 cycle is raging and the hurdles the former vice president faces as he prepares to jump into a potentially crowded field.

Advertisement

For more than a decade, Pence has forged a deep relationship with Kansas’ free-market network—a relationship that stretches longer than almost any other potential Republican candidate. Among the potential contenders, Pence is Only who speaks at a Tea Party rally supported by a shack on the National Mall on September 12, 2009, a scene he recounts in his political memoirs God help me.

As Governor of Indiana, Pence pushed for the kind of tax cuts the network favored. He went on to hire employees associated with Koch’s world, including his senior advisor Mark Short, who left the Koch Freedom Partners group where he was head of the business. Marco Rubio Presidential election campaign. Short still maintains close ties to the network.

In his bid for governor in 2012, Pence received $200,000 in contributions from billionaire David Koch and another $5,000 from Koch Industries. As vice president, Pence met with Koch donors in Manhattan in 2018 ahead of that year’s midterm session to help them plan strategy.

During the 2016 cycle, before Pence chose against that year’s presidential bid in favor of defending his gubernatorial seat, the Koch network had named him as their preferred candidate. Last year, Pence headlined an Americans for Prosperity event, during which he lowered the price of gas to $2.38 at a gas station in Hobart, Indiana.

Pence has been touring the country on his writing tour in recent weeks, including a stop earlier this week in Houston, Texas, ahead of a potential presidential campaign — one that if it does is likely still “months” away, according to one adviser. . He is also embroiled in a classified documents scandal and has been subpoenaed by a grand jury in connection with Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into former President Donald Trump’s bid to overturn the 2020 election.

Advertisement

But there is a sense within Republican circles that there are ways for Trump’s opponent to secure the party’s presidential nomination. In part, this is because some major donor networks and advocacy arms, such as the Koch family, have expressed interest in moving on from the 45th president.

“They will prioritize a candidate who values ​​free markets, free speech, and free trade,” said Ken Spin, a partner at Narrative Strategies who led corporate communications at Koch Industries. The Koch Network has typically supported candidates who reflect their worldview. Trump was the opposite of that.”

Spain referred to Pence and the South Carolina senator. Tim Scott As potential winners of the Koch primaries. In recent years, Charles Koch has expressed interest in Criminal justice and police reform, a move some Republicans believe could point them to Scott, who is making calls about a potential presidential campaign and leading the charge in the Republican Senate on police reform measures. Scott has had several run-ins with Koch-related endeavors, but someone close to him said he wasn’t aware of any recent back-channel efforts between Americans for Prosperity and the senator regarding the 2024 bid.

“Bence and Scott have cleared hurdles with the network in the past,” Spain said. They belong to the free market and free speech point of view. The question is: Where does the network stand today and can it lag behind [Ron] DeSantis brand out of province? “

Advertisement

Winning the Koch Network nod would be a boon for any candidate: A network spokesperson said the network pass would include massive grassroots infrastructure, highly targeted door knocking, phone calls, mail, and ads generated by them. data playback i360. The network spent nearly $500 million supporting candidates and free market causes through 2020, and about $80 million in the midterms of 2022. Not to mention brick-and-mortar operations in 36 states..

Koch’s emerging primary and Pence’s uncertain status despite years of loyalty and ideological alignment point to the network’s shifting priorities and realpolitik Desire to support a candidate who can win the Republican primary. As CEO of Americans for Prosperity, Emily Seidel wrote in a noteThe group is “prepared to support a candidate in the Republican presidential primary who can lead our country forward, and who can Wins. “

Natalie Allison contributed to this report

Source link

Advertisement

Politics

The Supreme Court guarantees, for now, wide access to the abortion pill

Published

on

By

Washington – Supreme Court He said Friday evening That the abortion pill mifepristone will still be widely available for now, delays the possibility of an abrupt end to a drug used in more than half of all abortions in the United States.

The order halted steps that sought to limit the availability of mifepristone while moving forward on appeal: a ruling from a Texas federal judge to suspend the drug from the market altogether and another from an appeals court to impose significant barriers to the pill, including blocking access by mail.

The unsigned one-paragraph order, which came hours before the restrictions went into effect, marked the second time in a year that the Supreme Court had considered a major effort to severely limit access to abortion.

The case could ultimately have profound implications, even for states where abortion is legal, as well as for the FDA’s regulatory power over other drugs.

Advertisement

If the ruling by the judge in Texas that overturned the FDA’s approval of the pill after more than two decades holds, it could set the stage for all kinds of challenges to the agency’s approval of other drugs and enable medical providers anywhere to do so. Opposing government policy that may affect the patient.

The Biden administration asked the Supreme Court to intervene after the US Court of Appeals allowed the Fifth Circuit to stand on a number of limitations in the Texas ruling, even as it said it would allow the pills to remain on the market.

In Friday’s order, Judges Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr.

Judge Thomas did not provide reasons, but Judge Alito noted that the Fifth Circuit has already narrowed down the more remote aspects of Texas rule. He added that the FDA and the manufacturer of the branded version of mifepristone, Danco Laboratories, “have not shown that they are likely to suffer irreparable harm” as the case continues in appeals court.

Judge Alito expressed skepticism about the FDA’s claims that regulatory “chaos” would ensue if the lower court’s ruling went into effect. Referring to a competing case brought by Democratic state attorneys general in Washington state, which is seen as a direct challenge to the case in Texas, he accused the FDA of taking advantage of the court system to implement “the desired policy while evading both necessary cases.” Agency Actions and Judicial Review”.

Advertisement

This is most likely not the final word from the judges. After the Fifth Circuit hears the appeal, the case will likely go back to the Supreme Court.

None of the justices appointed by President Donald J. Trump have publicly objected.

The court’s decision is, at least temporarily, a victory for the Biden administration.

President Biden welcomed the decision, saying that “the administration will continue to advocate for the Food and Drug Administration’s independent expert authority to review, approve, and regulate a broad range of prescription drugs.”

He added that the Texas ruling “would have undermined the FDA’s medical judgment and endangered women’s health.”

Advertisement

A spokesperson for the Food and Drug Administration declined to comment.

The reaction of the plaintiffs — a coalition of anti-abortion groups and many doctors — has been muted.

The fight will continue, said Eric Baptiste, senior counsel at the Coalition for Defense of Freedom, a conservative legal organization representing the coalition.

“The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must be held accountable for the damage it has caused to the health of countless women and girls and the rule of law by failing to examine the riskiness of the chemical abortion drug regimen and to remove every meaningful safeguard, even allowing mail-order abortions,” said Mr. Baptist. .

After the Supreme Court struck down a constitutional right to abortion in June, political and legal battles have turned to medical abortion, a two-drug regimen usually used in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.

Advertisement

The first drug, mifepristone, inhibits the reproductive hormone progesterone, and the second, misoprostol, taken a day or two later, stimulates contractions and helps the uterus expel its contents.

More than five million women have used mifepristone to terminate their pregnancies in the United States, and dozens of other countries have approved the drug for use.

The case reached the judges after a quick and tangled battle over the legal status of the grain.

In November, plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in the Amarillo Circuit of the Texas federal court system, ensuring that the case would be brought before a single judge: Matthew J.

Justice Kaksmarek, a Trump appointee, is a longtime opponent of abortion who joined the platform after working for the First Liberty Institute, a conservative legal group focused on religious freedom issues.

Advertisement

The coalition that brought the lawsuit, the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, argued that the Food and Drug Administration improperly approved the birth control pill in 2000 and that mifepristone is unsafe. The agency has strongly disputed these claims, citing studies showing that serious complications are rare and that less than 1 percent of patients require hospitalization.

This month, Judge Kaksmarek, in an interim ruling, declared the FDA’s approval of the drug invalid and gave both parties a week to seek emergency relief before the decision took effect.

Less than an hour later, a federal judge in Washington state, Thomas O. Rice, appointed by President Barack Obama, issued a conflicting ruling in a separate lawsuit involving mifepristone. Judge Rice blocked the FDA from limiting the availability of birth control pills to the 17 states and the District of Columbia, which were parties to that lawsuit.

Competing rulings mean the matter is almost certain to go to the Supreme Court.

The FDA immediately appealed Judge Kaksmarek’s decision, and a divided panel of three Fifth Circuit judges, in New Orleans, upheld the agency’s approval of the drug, ensuring that mifepristone would remain on the market.

Advertisement

But the commission raised several barriers to access, sided in part with Judge Kacsmarek, while the suit went through the courts. It blocked a series of steps the Food and Drug Administration has taken since 2016 to increase the availability and distribution of the drug, such as allowing it to be mailed and prescribed by non-physician medical providers.

Adam Liptak And Christina Jewett Contribute to the preparation of reports.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Ohio Senate Candidate Calls for Reparations for Whites…But There’s a Catch | Expert portal

Published

on

By

As liberal states and municipalities explore the idea of ​​reparations for African Americans, one US Senate candidate in Ohio running to unseat Sherrod Brown (D-OH) has floated reparations for white Americans, but not all white Americans.

100 percent fed up Reports – Bernie Moreno, owner of a chain of auto dealerships across the Midwest, He called for compensation for the descendants of Union soldiers who died during the Civil War.

Moreno noted that such a thing as the death of white soldiers to free black slaves only happened in the United States.

Advertisement

He is the second Republican to throw his name into the hat for the GOP nomination for the 2024 Senate race, and Ohio Senator Matt Dolan is also vying for the nomination.

Moreno previously ran for Senate in 2022, and spent a large amount of his money promoting his campaign, but dropped out after meeting with former President Donald Trump, who ended up endorsing Sen. J.D. Vance (R) in the primaries.

Moreno describes himself as an “externally conservative” and will once again be able to finance a large portion of his campaign himself.

New York Post reports

Bernie Moreno, a Republican looking to challenge US Senator Sherrod Brown, has suggested that the white descendants of Northern Civil War soldiers should be eligible for some form of compensation.

“We stand on the shoulders of giants, right? We stand on the shoulders of people like John Adams, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, George Washington. That this group of people took over the greatest empire in history. They said no, we’re not going to stand with this. And he won, Moreno told supporters at a campaign event in Buckeye State this week.

“That same group of people later, the whites, died to liberate the blacks. This has never happened in human history before, but it has happened here in America. This isn’t taught much in schools, is it?” he added.

“They make it sound like America is a broken, racist country. You name a country that did that: that freed slaves, that died to do it. You know, they talk about reparations. Where are the reparations for people in the North who died to save black lives?”



Source link

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Politics

Senator calls on Republicans for a concerted campaign to ban abortion

Published

on

By

Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minnesota) has made clear that the abortion bans being enacted in red states are not unilateral decisions but part of a concerted Republican plan to take away health care freedom.

video:

Advertisement

Smith told CNN’s Jim Acosta when asked about the Supreme Court’s suspension of the abortion pill ban ruling:

I worked at Planned Parenthood where I saw women every day making good decisions about their health care, not needing politicians to tell them what to do for people living in countries where abortion is still protected, and that freedom is still protected. They can know that, for now, they will still have access to abortion medication.

But as your article before I came showed, women in states across the country are losing that access. And this is not happening just now. This is part of a concerted campaign by this Republican party to strip that freedom away and I worked at Planned Parenthood when I saw this long-standing effort to ban abortion and that’s really what we’re seeing and proclaiming all over the country and I think that’s what we’d see at the federal level if they had The right to vote.

Advertisement

The issue of abortion is the issue of freedom. Republicans are trying to take away from the majority of the US population the freedom to control their own bodies and make their own healthcare decisions. Every American who values ​​individual freedom should be outraged by what the Republicans are doing.

These bans are not isolated individual decisions made by state governments. Ban is a concerted campaign to effectively ban abortion in the United States. Senator Smith was right. If the Republicans controlled the government, they would ban abortion.

The media tends to treat plagiarism as individual acts, but they need to see the bigger picture. If Americans wish to remain free, they must stop those who are bent on destroying the most personal individual liberties.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending