Connect with us

Tech

The future of social media is much less social

Published

on

For nearly two decades, Facebook has exploded onto college campuses as a site for students to keep in touch. Then came Twitter, where people posted what they had for breakfast, and Instagram, where friends shared photos to keep up with each other.

Today, Instagram and Facebook feeds Full of ads and sponsored posts. TikTok and Snapchat are filled with videos from influencers promoting dish soap and dating apps. And soon, the Twitter posts with the most visibility will come mostly from subscribers who pay for the view and other perks.

Social media has become, in many ways, less social. The types of posts where people tell friends and family about their lives have become more difficult over the years as the largest sites have become increasingly “institutional”. Instead of seeing messages and photos from friends and relatives about their vacations or fancy dinners, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Twitter, and Snapchat users often see professional content from brands, influencers, and others who pay for placement.

The change has implications for the big social networking companies and how people interact with each other digitally. But it also raises questions about a core idea: the online platform. For years, the platform idea has prevailed – the all-in-one, public-facing site where people spend most of their time. But as big social networks have made connecting people with brands a priority over connecting them with other people, some users have started looking for community sites and apps dedicated to specific hobbies and issues.

Advertisement

“Platforms as we knew them are gone,” said Zizi Papacharisi, a professor of communications at the University of Illinois-Chicago who teaches courses on social media. “They have outlived their usefulness.”

This shift helps explain why some social networking companies, which continue to have billions of users and generate billions of dollars in revenue, are exploring new avenues for business. Owned by Elon Musk, Twitter forces people and brands to pay between $8 and $1,000 per month to become subscribers. Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, is moving into the immersive internet world of the so-called metaverse.

For users, this means that instead of spending all of their time on one or a few large social networks, some are gravitating towards smaller, more focused sites. These include Mastodon, which is essentially a version of Twitter divided into communities; Nextdoor, a social network for neighbors to connect on everyday issues like local potholes; And apps like Truth Social, which was started by former President Donald J. Trump and seen as a social network for conservatives.

“It’s not about picking one network to rule them all — that’s crazy Silicon Valley logic,” said Ethan Zuckerman, professor of public policy at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. “The future is that you are a member of dozens of different societies, because as human beings, that is how we are.”

Twitter, which automatically responds to press inquiries with a poop emoji, had no comment on the evolution of the social network. Meta declined to comment, and TikTok did not respond to a request for comment. Snap, the maker of the Snapchat app, said that while the app has evolved, connecting people with their friends and family has remained its primary function.

Advertisement

The shift to smaller, more focused networks was predicted years ago by some of the biggest names on social media, including Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, and Jack Dorsey, founder of Twitter.

In 2019, Mr. Zuckerberg wrote in a Facebook post that Private messages and small groups The fastest growing areas of communication have been the Internet. Mr. Dorsey, who stepped down as CEO of Twitter in 2021, has pushed for so-called decentralized social networks that give people control over the content they see and the communities they engage with. It was recently posted on oura social media site based on this principle.

Over the past year, technologists and academics have also focused on smaller social networks. in paper Published last month in “The Three-Legged Stool: A Manifesto for a Smaller and Denser Internet,” Mr. Zuckerman and other academics outline how companies of the future can run small networks at low costs.

They also suggested creating an app that would essentially act as a Swiss Army knife of social networking by letting people switch between the sites they’re on, including Twitter, Mastodon, Reddit, and smaller networks. One of these applications is called mushroom It was developed by the MIT Media Lab and the University of Massachusetts Amherst, and is set to launch next month.

The difficult part for users is to find the newer and smaller networks because they are obscure. But broader social networks, such as Mastodon or Reddit, often act as a gateway to smaller communities. When registering with Mastodon, for example, people can choose a server from a file Extensive listincluding those related to games, food, and activity.

Advertisement

Mastodon CEO Eugene Roshko said that users make more than 1 billion posts per month across its communities and that there are no algorithms or ads altering people’s feeds.

One of the main benefits of microgrids is that they create forums for specific communities, including marginalized people. Ahwaa, founded in 2011, is a social network for members of the LGBTQ community in countries around the Persian Gulf where homosexuality is illegal. Other small networks, eg Letterbox dan app for movie fans to share their opinions about movies, focusing on special interests.

Smaller communities can also relieve some of the social pressure caused by social media use, especially for young people. Over the past decade, stories have surfaced — including congressional hearings on the dangers of social media — about teens developing eating disorders after trying to live up to “Instagram perfect” photos and by watching videos on TikTok.

Experts say the idea that a new social media site might come to be the one app for everyone seems unrealistic. When young people finish trying a new network—like BeReal, the photo-sharing app that was popular with teens last year but now bleeds millions of active users—they move on to the next network.

“They won’t be impressed by the first shiny platform that comes with them,” said Ms. Papacharissi.

Advertisement

She added that people’s online identities would become increasingly fragmented across multiple locations. To talk about professional accomplishments, there’s LinkedIn. For playing video games with fellow gamers, there is Discord. To discuss news stories, there is an artifact.

“What we’re interested in are smaller groups of people reaching out to each other about specific things,” said Ms Papacharissi.

There are likely to be more small networks on the horizon. Last year, Harvard University, where Zuckerberg founded Facebook in 2004 as a student, began a research program dedicated to rebooting social media. The program helps students and others create new networks and try them out together.

An application that popped up from the program, minus, allows users to only post 100 posts in their timeline for a lifetime. The idea is to make people feel connected in an environment where their time together is treated as a precious and finite resource, unlike traditional social networks like Facebook and Twitter that use endless swiping interfaces to keep users engaged for as long as possible.

“It’s a performance art experiment,” said Jonathan Zitrin, the Harvard professor of law and computer science who started the research initiative. “It’s the kind of thing that once you see it, it doesn’t have to be that way.”

Advertisement

Source link

Tech

Smartphone scams are dead – Android Authority

Published

on

By

Robert Triggs/Android Authority

Ten years ago, the 2013 Samsung Galaxy S4 was a technological marvel. Android phones had only been around for a few years at that point, and it seemed like the Galaxy S4 could do a lot despite its small size. As consumers, we were delighted. So much so, that to this day the Galaxy S4 remains the best-selling Android phone of all time, with over 80 million units sold.

However, that was ten years ago – an eternity in the tech world. Things have changed dramatically since then. The smartphone tricks we saw in the Galaxy S4 — like the Smart Scroll, which let you scroll the contents of your screen by moving your head up or down — would be completely ridiculous to see in a 2023 phone.

Today, smartphones are ubiquitous gadgets, not technical marvels. Consumers are using their phones more than ever before, yes, but that has faded the shine. Modern smartphone buyers don’t want gimmicks. They want a phone that fixes the basics and hides in the background.

Advertisement

In 2023, if a smartphone manufacturer thinks that some cool new trick will be the backbone that sells its phones, it will be in a world of disappointment. Not only will consumers care, but investing in research and development for this trick could do more harm than good.

What are the tricks of the smartphone?

Google Pixel 4 XL Long Range 2 review

Oliver Cragg / Android Authority

The term “gimmick” can be used broadly. In general, when it comes to smartphones, we think of gimmicks as features that are only applicable to very specific situations, appeal to a limited subset of users, or offer no real value (or some combination thereof).

One of history’s most egregious examples of smartphone scams was the Soli radar system in the Google Pixel 4 and Pixel 4 XL. Soli was a set of front-facing radar sensors that could track your hand movements. They let you do things like pause the music simply by waving your hand near the screen. While Soli performed as advertised, consumers simply didn’t care, and the Pixel 4 series was the biggest failure in Pixel history.

If your star phone feature only appeals to a few people, it’s probably a gimmick.

Advertisement

A more recent example came with the OnePlus 10 Pro last year. This phone was equipped with an ultra-high resolution camera with a field of view of 150 degrees. This was essentially a fish-eye lens, creating highly distorted images that looked unreal. Although software trickery helped fix images in post-processing, critics and consumers alike saw no need for such a bizarre lens. OnePlus eliminated the lens on this year’s OnePlus 10T and OnePlus 11.

Here are some other smartphone tricks we’ve seen:

  • foreign matter: OnePlus recently announced the Jupiter Rock Edition of the OnePlus 11. It has a back that is basically made of rock. Who asked for this?
  • Macro lenses: While a great telephoto lens can be an interesting addition to a solid lens collection, most of the time that’s not the case. Often, OEMs will throw in cheap 2MP macro lenses to make a phone look more premium than it is. In other words, the thought process is that more lenses = better cameras, which consumers are no longer fooled by.
  • Super fast charging: While it’s crazy to see 240W charging speeds on a smartphone (that’s fast enough to charge from empty to full in about ten minutes), who really needs that? These speeds are also said to be detrimental to the health of the battery, thus shortening the life of your phone.
  • Cooling systems: Lenovo Legion Duel 2 – a gaming phone – had a cooling fan built into it. While this is practical for a phone designed for gamers, it also made the phone unwieldy, prevented an IP rating, and made wireless charging impossible. It solved one problem at the expense of basic smartphone features. Likewise, OnePlus’ latest concept phone has a liquid cooling system that didn’t even work.

These gimmicks don’t help sell phones because they don’t give us what we really want: a great overall experience.

But what about phones in specific niches, like rugged phones? Is the rugged phone a gimmick? I’d argue it isn’t, but they also don’t sell in the numbers we’d see with something like the Galaxy S series. These phones exist for specific purposes for a specific consumer, so they get a special pass.

The current smartphone successes are all the evidence you need

Google Pixel 7 Pro camera housing

Robert Triggs/Android Authority

We know why smartphone manufacturers invest in these kinds of tricks. They obviously think they’ll help sell the phones or, at the very least, help their products stand out from the crowd. This is an odd strategy because the most successful phones tend to be relatively gimmick-free.

Advertisement

Here in the US, the iPhone is by far the most popular smartphone. For the first time ever, Apple has more than 50% of the market in the US, leaving the other half to Android OEMs (mostly Samsung). The iPhone doesn’t have a lot of tricks. One could argue that Dynamic Island is a gimmick, but it’s one that consumers seem to enjoy, so it doesn’t really count.

Unsurprisingly, the most successful phones are also some of the most gimmick-free.

In second place, Samsung’s Galaxy S series also stands out as being gimmick-free. The Galaxy S23 Ultra’s S Pen may be a bit gimmicky for some. However, it’s also incredibly popular and a calling card for a premium Galaxy experience, so we’ll be happy to let this feature slip. Despite this, the Galaxy S23 and Galaxy S23 Plus are pretty boring with how functional and no-nonsense they are. And guess what? The Galaxy S23 line is selling better than the Galaxy S22 line.

Of course, we can’t forget about Google’s pixel font. The Google Pixel 7 Pro doesn’t have any weird tricks up its sleeve, and was voted the best Android phone of 2022 by both Android Authority And our readers. It’s interesting that when Google gave up the tricks, it ended up selling more phones than ever before.

Obviously, phones can reach consumers without gimmicks. However, Dynamic Island and the S Pen show that there is still room for fun and doing things differently.

Advertisement

However, phones can still be fun

None Phone Number 1 graphic on the back

Oliver Cragg / Android Authority

We’ve already discussed plenty of examples of stupid smartphone tricks that get in the way of a good experience. However, some tricks work.

Take Nothing Phone 1, for example. The lights on the back of the device — officially known as The Glyph — appear to be a ridiculous gimmick. Once you use the phone, you will realize that it is actually an Android smartphone with a strange light show added. In other words, The Glyph can be ignored, and you’ll still get a great Android experience with a very fair cost-to-value ratio.

I’m not against the trick. There is plenty of room for fun features.

This is a great example of how doing tricks properly can be beneficial. Nothing crammed into The Glyph comes at the expense of wireless charging, a premium feel, or a decent camera system. Use the trick as a light garnish on top of a satisfying meal. It’s a beautiful detail that highlights an already well-done dish.

Advertisement

Google’s Magic Eraser is another example of a gimmick that works. With the Pixel’s camera experience already being one of the best (if not the best) phone camera experiences available, the Magic Eraser feature exists as a useful tool for people looking to fix otherwise great photos. It was not Need Magic Eraser, but it’s practical and fun when you want it to be.

That’s all to say that smartphones don’t need to be boring. There’s plenty of room for fun gimmicks, cool aesthetics, and thought-provoking twists. But gimmicks can’t be the phone’s selling point. They must be side players.

OEMs will need to shift focus — or dump

Lenovo Legion Duel 2 1

Luke Pollack / Android Authority

Remember Lenovo Legion Duel 2, the phone with an integrated cooling system? Unfortunately, this trick didn’t work out very well for Lenovo. Recently, the company confirmed this Android Authority He shut down the Legion’s smartphone arm.

We’ve also mentioned OnePlus several times in this article. This company is not doing well either. There is a rumor that it could pull out along with sister brand OPPO from the European market either this year or in 2024. OnePlus has lost all carrier partnerships in the US, and its latest flagship — the OnePlus 11 — hasn’t gotten strong reviews. Again, tricks don’t seem to have helped here.

Advertisement

What do you think of smartphone scams?

146 votes

This all supports my central argument: scams don’t sell phones. We’ve settled on wanting phones that excel at the essentials: battery life, camera, screen, usability, performance, and so on. I could also argue that design is just as important here, though it’s more subjective than something like battery life. What doesn’t matter are the extra lenses, radar systems, cooling fans, rock-solid backboards, and all the other tricks we’ve seen.

Companies that are stuck in 2013 and think cool gimmicks will sell a lot of phones will need to wake up from that dream sooner rather than later. Apple and Samsung eat your lunch and do so without relying on gimmicks. Make your phones awesome at a competitive price and we’ll buy it. Simply.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

All of my favorite games this year are old

Published

on

By

I also installed the original version Final Fantasy, the game that debuted when I was three years old, on Sony’s most advanced console yet, I came to a realization: everything I played this year was outdated. Between remakes, new releases, and vintage collections, there’s been a flood of nostalgia. I personally welcomed it.

These kinds of releases aren’t new, of course. What was different during the early months was the huge amount of classic releases. Two of the biggest movies so far this year – dead space And Resident Evil 4 – is a remake of titles from more than a decade ago. Both are slick, slick updates that don’t look out of place among recent big-budget releases, but part of what makes them so attractive is how straightforward they are. There are no open worlds filled with endless quests or live service items to keep you coming back. And most of these design decisions date back to their ages, as these games were made at a completely different time with very different expectations. In my review of Resident Evil 4 A remake, I called it “a video game like this,” and I meant that as a compliment.

Advance Wars 1 + 2: Re-Boot Camp.
Image: Nintendo

But they can also be a lot of work, frequently setting in to be all-consuming experiences that keep you hooked and never let go. Oh I love Fortnite Like everyone else, but that’s not all I want from my video games. Whether it is as complicated as RE4 Or simply put a scene from the opera Final Fantasy VI On my PS5, these games have returned a simplicity and focus I often find missing from their modern contemporaries. vampire And Final Fantasy They are very different experiences, but they give me the same feeling of a whole solo journey that I’m supposed to play through from start to finish. Same goes for the other old games I’ve been playing.

Advertisement

Playing—and in many cases, replaying—these games was an exercise in reminding myself of what could be so great about a medium. The largest modern versions tend to imitate each other to the point where they are almost indistinguishable from one another. That’s what makes a lot of indie releases so exciting, and likewise, what keeps me coming back for all these new releases of old games — so it’s good to me that this trend shows no sign of stopping.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

NBCUniversal CEO Jeff Shell leaves Comcast due to ‘improper conduct’

Published

on

By

NBCUniversal CEO Jeff Shell will leave Comcast, effective immediately. The telecom giant made the surprising announcement in a brief press release Released on Sunday. After an investigation prompted by a complaint of improper conduct, Comcast says it has reached a “joint” decision with Shell that he should resign from his position.

“Today is my last day as CEO of NBCUniversal. I had an inappropriate relationship with a woman in the company, which I deeply regret,” Shell said in a joint statement. “I am really sorry that I left my colleagues at Comcast and NBCUniversal, they are the most talented people in this field and the opportunity to work with them over the past 19 years has been a privilege.”

Comcast has not named a successor to Shell. in a note obtained diverseComcast CEO Brian Roberts and President Mike Kavanagh told employees they were “disappointed” to share the news. “We built this company on a culture of integrity. Nothing is more important than how we treat each other. You must count on your leaders to create a safe and respectful workplace,” they wrote. “When our principles and policies are violated, we will always move quickly to take appropriate action, as we have done here.”

Advertisement

Shell joined Comcast in 2004. He became CEO of NBCUniversal in 2020. That same year, he oversaw the launch of Peacock. Shell leaves NBCUniversal without making the streaming service profitable. At the beginning of the year, Comcast told investors that it had done so Added five million paid subscribers During the last three months of 2022. However, over the same period, the company lost nearly $1 billion while operating the service.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending