Videos show a warlike shower of shrapnel exploding away from the launch site into nearby beaches, wetlands and at least one vehicle.
updated Apr 22, 2023 at 4:12 PM EST|published Apr 21, 2023 at 3:56 PM EST
A SpaceX launch vehicle debris litters the beach and shoreline in Boca Chica, Texas on April 20 (Video: SpaceX)
Advertisement
comment
Big rockets release massive amounts of energy—and none more so than SpaceX’s Starship, the world’s most powerful rocket, which generates twice as much thrust as the Saturn V rocket that flew the Apollo astronauts toward the Moon.
So when it lifted off Thursday, the roughly 400-foot spacecraft splattered debris hundreds of yards like mortar bombs, leaving a crater under the launch pad, dents in nearby storage tanks and questions about the extent of repairs and when SpaceX might be able to attempt a launch again.
videos shared on social media It showed a piece of debris hitting a truck hundreds of meters from the launch site as cameras fell nearby. They also showed fragments hitting the nearby beach and striking the shoreline, making it look like a war zone. A scattering of debris falling into the wetlands can be seen on multiple sides of the launch pad for 10 seconds or more after launch.
Photographers who were allowed to retrieve their equipment remotely reported Saturday afternoon a lot of damageThe public road that passes the site has finally reopened – about 24 hours later than expected. Concrete blocks were scattered around. Parts of the launch pad’s legs were ripped off, exposed rebar was scattered off the ground and fencing along the road was torn down.
Advertisement
In a tweet on Saturday, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk said that while it was still early in the analysis, “the force of the engines at throttle may have broken down the concrete, rather than simply eroding it.” He added that “the engines were only at half thrust” for an earlier test of the missile.
Knowing the missile and its 33 powerful first-stage engines could wreak havoc in the area, especially if it exploded on the pad, the FAA and local officials imposed a wide safety zone, forcing people to stay miles away. Boats were banned from certain parts of the Gulf of Mexico, and air traffic was cleared, as were missile launches.
As a result, the FAA said no one was injured and no public property was damaged. The FAA has authorized more than 530 launches, “none of which resulted in death, injury, or major damage to public property,” said an FAA official who was not authorized to speak publicly before the launch. “I think we’ve done a pretty good job of overseeing safety and maintaining our top priority.”
Debris hit a nearby vehicle after the launch of the SpaceX Starship in Boca Chica, Texas on April 20 (Video: LabPadre via Storyful)
Coast launch sites are set for a reason: to make sure that rockets don’t endanger populated areas as they head into space. Damage to launch sites and surrounding areas is not uncommon. During the dawn of the space age, NASA routinely blew up rockets as it rushed to beat the Soviet Union to the moon during the Cold War space race. Today, missiles flying from Cape Canaveral have set off alarms in parked cars four or five miles away, and rattled windows in communities across Florida’s space coast.
Advertisement
And late last year when NASA launched the massive Space Launch System, at the time the most powerful rocket to fly, it burned the launch pad and blew the doors off the elevator in the portable launch tower.
“It just goes to show that the environment … isn’t friendlier when you have the world’s most powerful rocket going,” Mike Saravin, a senior NASA official, said at the time.
NASA officials said that repairs to the SLS’ ground facilities were not so extensive that they would delay the next launch of the rocket. But that is not due until late next year.
Ahead of Thursday’s launch, Musk said success will be measured by a simple metric: “Just don’t blow up the launch pad.”
“It could take us several months to rebuild the launch pad if we melt it down,” he added.
Advertisement
So when the Starship rocket, fueled by 10 million pounds of high-burning fuel, took off and cleared the turret, leaving behind a massive plume and flame but the turret intact, there was a sense of relief, even though the vehicle exploded about four minutes into the flight.
Musk hoped to launch another Starship in “a few months.” But that will depend on how widespread the damage is and how quickly SpaceX can repair it. The company may also decide to make the launch pad the missile sits on more flexible as well as install a more powerful water immersion system to dampen acoustic vibrations.
musk he wrote on Twitter on Friday that three months ago, the company had begun building “a massive water-cooled steel plate to fit into the launch pad.” But he said it “wasn’t ready in time” and that the company hoped the concrete under the rocket would hold up on the first launch. However, Musk added that “it looks like we could be ready to launch again in one to two months.” But even Musk said he’s often overly optimistic about his schedule predictions.
The pad does not contain a flame diverter, which is used to direct the missile’s fire and exhaust in a controlled manner. In 2020, Musk tweeted that the company “was aspiring to not have a flame-retardant in Boca, but that may be a mistake”.
NASA hopes the company will attempt a launch soon. The space agency relies on the Starship to land astronauts on the moon as part of its Artemis program. The first landing has been tentatively scheduled for 2025, although a landing in 2026 or later is more likely. But before a spacecraft can attempt a moon landing, it must first reach orbit, prove that it can fly reliably and safely, and achieve a host of other milestones.
Advertisement
In an earlier test campaign, the company blew up several spacecraft prototypes, which flew about six miles high and then crashed before the company was finally able to land successfully. After each explosion, the company quickly cleaned up the site and started again. Rather he Create a hotline Promoted by the county to local residents to report the wreck.
Some believe that the company will move quickly to launch Starship again.
“SpaceX moves quickly when they see what needs fixing,” Abhi Tripathi, a former SpaceX mission manager, said. wrote on Twitter. “I suppose they will treat launch site results with the same importance they show Starship design issues. I have to think about it in terms of a whole system.”
SpaceX is also building a launch tower for the Starship at one of its pads at Kennedy Space Center in Florida, which could give it an alternative launch site.
In granting initial approval to SpaceX last year, the FAA required the company to meet 75 conditions intended to protect the environment. But some environmental groups said they don’t go far enough and the missiles endanger local wildlife and a fragile ecosystem.
Advertisement
“From our perspective, it’s good news that it didn’t explode at the pillow site, but future launches could,” Michael Barr, president of the American Bird Conservancy, told The Washington Post after the launch. If an eruption occurred over sensitive wetlands, he said, the cleanup would further disturb the environment.
Ten years ago, the 2013 Samsung Galaxy S4 was a technological marvel. Android phones had only been around for a few years at that point, and it seemed like the Galaxy S4 could do a lot despite its small size. As consumers, we were delighted. So much so, that to this day the Galaxy S4 remains the best-selling Android phone of all time, with over 80 million units sold.
However, that was ten years ago – an eternity in the tech world. Things have changed dramatically since then. The smartphone tricks we saw in the Galaxy S4 — like the Smart Scroll, which let you scroll the contents of your screen by moving your head up or down — would be completely ridiculous to see in a 2023 phone.
Today, smartphones are ubiquitous gadgets, not technical marvels. Consumers are using their phones more than ever before, yes, but that has faded the shine. Modern smartphone buyers don’t want gimmicks. They want a phone that fixes the basics and hides in the background.
Advertisement
In 2023, if a smartphone manufacturer thinks that some cool new trick will be the backbone that sells its phones, it will be in a world of disappointment. Not only will consumers care, but investing in research and development for this trick could do more harm than good.
What are the tricks of the smartphone?
Oliver Cragg / Android Authority
The term “gimmick” can be used broadly. In general, when it comes to smartphones, we think of gimmicks as features that are only applicable to very specific situations, appeal to a limited subset of users, or offer no real value (or some combination thereof).
One of history’s most egregious examples of smartphone scams was the Soli radar system in the Google Pixel 4 and Pixel 4 XL. Soli was a set of front-facing radar sensors that could track your hand movements. They let you do things like pause the music simply by waving your hand near the screen. While Soli performed as advertised, consumers simply didn’t care, and the Pixel 4 series was the biggest failure in Pixel history.
If your star phone feature only appeals to a few people, it’s probably a gimmick.
Advertisement
A more recent example came with the OnePlus 10 Pro last year. This phone was equipped with an ultra-high resolution camera with a field of view of 150 degrees. This was essentially a fish-eye lens, creating highly distorted images that looked unreal. Although software trickery helped fix images in post-processing, critics and consumers alike saw no need for such a bizarre lens. OnePlus eliminated the lens on this year’s OnePlus 10T and OnePlus 11.
Here are some other smartphone tricks we’ve seen:
foreign matter: OnePlus recently announced the Jupiter Rock Edition of the OnePlus 11. It has a back that is basically made of rock. Who asked for this?
Macro lenses: While a great telephoto lens can be an interesting addition to a solid lens collection, most of the time that’s not the case. Often, OEMs will throw in cheap 2MP macro lenses to make a phone look more premium than it is. In other words, the thought process is that more lenses = better cameras, which consumers are no longer fooled by.
Super fast charging: While it’s crazy to see 240W charging speeds on a smartphone (that’s fast enough to charge from empty to full in about ten minutes), who really needs that? These speeds are also said to be detrimental to the health of the battery, thus shortening the life of your phone.
Cooling systems: Lenovo Legion Duel 2 – a gaming phone – had a cooling fan built into it. While this is practical for a phone designed for gamers, it also made the phone unwieldy, prevented an IP rating, and made wireless charging impossible. It solved one problem at the expense of basic smartphone features. Likewise, OnePlus’ latest concept phone has a liquid cooling system that didn’t even work.
These gimmicks don’t help sell phones because they don’t give us what we really want: a great overall experience.
But what about phones in specific niches, like rugged phones? Is the rugged phone a gimmick? I’d argue it isn’t, but they also don’t sell in the numbers we’d see with something like the Galaxy S series. These phones exist for specific purposes for a specific consumer, so they get a special pass.
The current smartphone successes are all the evidence you need
Robert Triggs/Android Authority
We know why smartphone manufacturers invest in these kinds of tricks. They obviously think they’ll help sell the phones or, at the very least, help their products stand out from the crowd. This is an odd strategy because the most successful phones tend to be relatively gimmick-free.
Advertisement
Here in the US, the iPhone is by far the most popular smartphone. For the first time ever, Apple has more than 50% of the market in the US, leaving the other half to Android OEMs (mostly Samsung). The iPhone doesn’t have a lot of tricks. One could argue that Dynamic Island is a gimmick, but it’s one that consumers seem to enjoy, so it doesn’t really count.
Unsurprisingly, the most successful phones are also some of the most gimmick-free.
In second place, Samsung’s Galaxy S series also stands out as being gimmick-free. The Galaxy S23 Ultra’s S Pen may be a bit gimmicky for some. However, it’s also incredibly popular and a calling card for a premium Galaxy experience, so we’ll be happy to let this feature slip. Despite this, the Galaxy S23 and Galaxy S23 Plus are pretty boring with how functional and no-nonsense they are. And guess what? The Galaxy S23 line is selling better than the Galaxy S22 line.
Of course, we can’t forget about Google’s pixel font. The Google Pixel 7 Pro doesn’t have any weird tricks up its sleeve, and was voted the best Android phone of 2022 by both Android Authority And our readers. It’s interesting that when Google gave up the tricks, it ended up selling more phones than ever before.
Obviously, phones can reach consumers without gimmicks. However, Dynamic Island and the S Pen show that there is still room for fun and doing things differently.
Advertisement
However, phones can still be fun
Oliver Cragg / Android Authority
We’ve already discussed plenty of examples of stupid smartphone tricks that get in the way of a good experience. However, some tricks work.
Take Nothing Phone 1, for example. The lights on the back of the device — officially known as The Glyph — appear to be a ridiculous gimmick. Once you use the phone, you will realize that it is actually an Android smartphone with a strange light show added. In other words, The Glyph can be ignored, and you’ll still get a great Android experience with a very fair cost-to-value ratio.
I’m not against the trick. There is plenty of room for fun features.
This is a great example of how doing tricks properly can be beneficial. Nothing crammed into The Glyph comes at the expense of wireless charging, a premium feel, or a decent camera system. Use the trick as a light garnish on top of a satisfying meal. It’s a beautiful detail that highlights an already well-done dish.
Advertisement
Google’s Magic Eraser is another example of a gimmick that works. With the Pixel’s camera experience already being one of the best (if not the best) phone camera experiences available, the Magic Eraser feature exists as a useful tool for people looking to fix otherwise great photos. It was not Need Magic Eraser, but it’s practical and fun when you want it to be.
That’s all to say that smartphones don’t need to be boring. There’s plenty of room for fun gimmicks, cool aesthetics, and thought-provoking twists. But gimmicks can’t be the phone’s selling point. They must be side players.
OEMs will need to shift focus — or dump
Luke Pollack / Android Authority
Remember Lenovo Legion Duel 2, the phone with an integrated cooling system? Unfortunately, this trick didn’t work out very well for Lenovo. Recently, the company confirmed this Android Authority He shut down the Legion’s smartphone arm.
We’ve also mentioned OnePlus several times in this article. This company is not doing well either. There is a rumor that it could pull out along with sister brand OPPO from the European market either this year or in 2024. OnePlus has lost all carrier partnerships in the US, and its latest flagship — the OnePlus 11 — hasn’t gotten strong reviews. Again, tricks don’t seem to have helped here.
Advertisement
What do you think of smartphone scams?
146 votes
This all supports my central argument: scams don’t sell phones. We’ve settled on wanting phones that excel at the essentials: battery life, camera, screen, usability, performance, and so on. I could also argue that design is just as important here, though it’s more subjective than something like battery life. What doesn’t matter are the extra lenses, radar systems, cooling fans, rock-solid backboards, and all the other tricks we’ve seen.
Companies that are stuck in 2013 and think cool gimmicks will sell a lot of phones will need to wake up from that dream sooner rather than later. Apple and Samsung eat your lunch and do so without relying on gimmicks. Make your phones awesome at a competitive price and we’ll buy it. Simply.
I also installed the original version Final Fantasy, the game that debuted when I was three years old, on Sony’s most advanced console yet, I came to a realization: everything I played this year was outdated. Between remakes, new releases, and vintage collections, there’s been a flood of nostalgia. I personally welcomed it.
These kinds of releases aren’t new, of course. What was different during the early months was the huge amount of classic releases. Two of the biggest movies so far this year – dead space And Resident Evil 4 – is a remake of titles from more than a decade ago. Both are slick, slick updates that don’t look out of place among recent big-budget releases, but part of what makes them so attractive is how straightforward they are. There are no open worlds filled with endless quests or live service items to keep you coming back. And most of these design decisions date back to their ages, as these games were made at a completely different time with very different expectations. In my review of Resident Evil 4 A remake, I called it “a video game like this,” and I meant that as a compliment.
Advance Wars 1 + 2: Re-Boot Camp.Image: Nintendo
But they can also be a lot of work, frequently setting in to be all-consuming experiences that keep you hooked and never let go. Oh I love Fortnite Like everyone else, but that’s not all I want from my video games. Whether it is as complicated as RE4 Or simply put a scene from the opera Final Fantasy VI On my PS5, these games have returned a simplicity and focus I often find missing from their modern contemporaries. vampire And Final Fantasy They are very different experiences, but they give me the same feeling of a whole solo journey that I’m supposed to play through from start to finish. Same goes for the other old games I’ve been playing.
Advertisement
Playing—and in many cases, replaying—these games was an exercise in reminding myself of what could be so great about a medium. The largest modern versions tend to imitate each other to the point where they are almost indistinguishable from one another. That’s what makes a lot of indie releases so exciting, and likewise, what keeps me coming back for all these new releases of old games — so it’s good to me that this trend shows no sign of stopping.
NBCUniversal CEO Jeff Shell will leave Comcast, effective immediately. The telecom giant made the surprising announcement in a brief press release Released on Sunday. After an investigation prompted by a complaint of improper conduct, Comcast says it has reached a “joint” decision with Shell that he should resign from his position.
“Today is my last day as CEO of NBCUniversal. I had an inappropriate relationship with a woman in the company, which I deeply regret,” Shell said in a joint statement. “I am really sorry that I left my colleagues at Comcast and NBCUniversal, they are the most talented people in this field and the opportunity to work with them over the past 19 years has been a privilege.”
Comcast has not named a successor to Shell. in a note obtained diverseComcast CEO Brian Roberts and President Mike Kavanagh told employees they were “disappointed” to share the news. “We built this company on a culture of integrity. Nothing is more important than how we treat each other. You must count on your leaders to create a safe and respectful workplace,” they wrote. “When our principles and policies are violated, we will always move quickly to take appropriate action, as we have done here.”
Advertisement
Shell joined Comcast in 2004. He became CEO of NBCUniversal in 2020. That same year, he oversaw the launch of Peacock. Shell leaves NBCUniversal without making the streaming service profitable. At the beginning of the year, Comcast told investors that it had done so Added five million paid subscribers During the last three months of 2022. However, over the same period, the company lost nearly $1 billion while operating the service.