Connect with us

Politics

Many countries are trying to restrict adult sex therapies as well

Published

on

Missouri this month became the first state in the country to severely restrict sex therapies for people of all ages, following a series of quieter moves across the country that were cutting off transgender adults’ access to medical care.

Last year, Florida joined six other states in banning Medicaid from covering some forms of sex care for transgender people of all ages. This ban affects a file The number of beneficiaries is estimated at 38,000 of the General Insurance Program, according to the Williams Institute, a think tank at UCLA School of Law.

And in at least five states, Republican lawmakers have proposed bills that would eliminate gender sponsorship for minors as well as young adults. Some try to ban it for anyone under the age of 21, and others for those under the age of 26.

The new Missouri sweeping policy took a different approach. Citing consumer protection laws meant to regulate fraud, the state’s attorney general, Andrew Bailey, has issued an emergency rule that prohibits doctors from giving gender-based treatments to patients — of any age — unless they adhere to a slew of important restrictions, including 18 months of psychiatric evaluation. . The rule also stated that patients should not receive gender therapies until any mental health issues had been “resolved”.

Advertisement

said Gillian Branstetter, a communications strategist for the American Civil Liberties Union, whose Missouri chapter is affiliated announce Its intention is to file a legal challenge to the rule.

“The political situation in terms of health care for transgender people has always been here,” said Ms. Branstetter.

The rule excludes people who are currently in treatment, as long as they and their doctors comply “promptly” with psychiatric evaluations and other restrictions.

Arrow Royston, a 35-year-old transgender man in St. Louis, said he was shocked. through the new policy. He said he had been taking testosterone for eight years, monthly Refills prescribed by his doctor. If he could no longer access treatments, he said, he would be devastated, and would travel out of state for care.

“I think what bothers me the most is that I am an active member of this community,” said Mr. Royston, a program manager for a US defense contractor. I have worked on defense programs to protect my nation. And my nation can’t protect me? “

Advertisement

Missouri’s new policy goes into effect April 27 and expires in February 2024, when the state legislature is back in session. (Two bills That would ban underage care — and prevent Medicaid from covering it for all ages — was not advanced in this year’s hearing.)

Although Mr. Bailey’s order applied to all ages, his public comments focused on children, echoing rhetoric from Republican politicians across the country and in Missouri. “As a public prosecutor, I will always fight to protect children because gender transition interventions are experimental,” Mr. Bailey said on Twitter.

In February, his office launched an investigation into the Gender Clinic for Youth at Washington University in St. Louis after a former employee filed a whistleblowing report. complaint Claiming that the patients there were taken to treatment and not enough psychiatric examinations were carried out. (the clinic He said They followed accepted standards of care.)

When asked why it contained adults, Madeline Serene, a spokeswoman for Mr. Bailey, said: “We have serious concerns about how children are treated across the state, but we believe everyone is entitled to access to evidence-based medication and adequate mental health care. “

Another 14 states — Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia and, as of Wednesday, North Dakota — have passed laws restricting gendered care of minors.

Advertisement

Although there is some controversy between Medical professionals About which children will benefit from gender confirmation care and when they should start treatment, there are several large medical groups in the United States, including American Academy of PediatricsThey condemned the legislative ban.

For transgender adults, several studies have shown that transitional care Can Improves myself Well-being and quality of life.

Terry Schilling, president of the American Principles Project, a right-wing advocacy group that has been pushing for restrictions on transgender rights, said in an interview earlier this year that the focus on minors was a short-term political expense. He said his organization’s long-term goal is to eliminate transitional care altogether.

He said, “I see this whole issue as much as I see lobotomy or eugenics – it’s a bad medical fad.”

Mr Schilling said policies could include outright bans on people of all ages, or bills to make it easier for people to sue medical providers if they regret moving. He also raised the possibility of classifying transitional care as “consumer fraud” – the same approach put forward by Mr. Bailey – because it maintains that it is impossible to change sex.

Advertisement

over many years, Seven states – Arizona, Florida, Missouri, Nebraska, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas have policies prohibiting Medicaid from covering certain types of gender confirmation care. (The Federal Low-Income Insurance Program is funded in part by states, which also have ample latitude to determine eligibility.)

Christie Mallory, legal director for the Williams Institute, said the Medicaid ban “is based on shaky legal foundations.” Courts in Wisconsin and West Virginia have ruled that such bans violate the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, as well as other federal rules.

But some lawmakers are introducing broader bills that would ban gender-related care in government-owned or operated health centers, or in those that accept government funding.

In Oklahoma, for example, a bill introduced this year by Senator Nathan Dahm would withhold Medicaid reimbursement — for any procedure or treatment — from any health center that provides gender-specific care or works with a provider that provides it.

In an interview in January, Dahm said his sole goal was to prevent taxpayer money from covering the transition. He said, “If an adult wants to make that decision and pay for it themselves, they can do it.” He also acknowledged that this policy could motivate some healthcare providers to stop providing care to adults.

Advertisement

Over the past few decades, doctors Increasingly removed Barriers, such as psychological assessments, for adults to obtain hormonal therapy, shifting decision-making to the patients themselves.

“There is a very broad consensus that gender confirmation care for adults is appropriate and beneficial,” said Erica Anderson, clinical psychologist and past president of the American Transgender Health Professional Association.

Dr. Anderson, a transgender woman, publicly They expressed their concerns About the growing number of adolescents, especially those with complex psychological problems, who seek gender-related care. It also supported the policies of some European countries, incl Sweden And Britainwhich recently restricted when children could undergo certain medical treatments.

But last month, Dr. Anderson joined in Hundreds of doctors In signing a letter affirming that gender affirmation care is beneficial and important to many transgender children, she denounced the legislative ban in the United States. She said efforts to extend these restrictions to adults would add significant harm.

“The lack of clarity between youth and adult care is ominous,” she said. “It is an ominous sign of the transgression of people who believe that the state should decide people’s personal lives.”

Advertisement

Missouri also received opposition among some conservatives in the state. said Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft, a Republican who recently announced he was running for governor St. Louis Public Radio that although he supported bans on children, he did not believe the state should restrict adult care.

“I don’t think people should do that,” Mr. Ashcroft said, referring to adult sex treatments. “But there is a difference between what I think and where I think government should be involved.”

Maggie Astor Contribute to the preparation of reports.

Source link

Advertisement

Politics

The Supreme Court guarantees, for now, wide access to the abortion pill

Published

on

By

Washington – Supreme Court He said Friday evening That the abortion pill mifepristone will still be widely available for now, delays the possibility of an abrupt end to a drug used in more than half of all abortions in the United States.

The order halted steps that sought to limit the availability of mifepristone while moving forward on appeal: a ruling from a Texas federal judge to suspend the drug from the market altogether and another from an appeals court to impose significant barriers to the pill, including blocking access by mail.

The unsigned one-paragraph order, which came hours before the restrictions went into effect, marked the second time in a year that the Supreme Court had considered a major effort to severely limit access to abortion.

The case could ultimately have profound implications, even for states where abortion is legal, as well as for the FDA’s regulatory power over other drugs.

Advertisement

If the ruling by the judge in Texas that overturned the FDA’s approval of the pill after more than two decades holds, it could set the stage for all kinds of challenges to the agency’s approval of other drugs and enable medical providers anywhere to do so. Opposing government policy that may affect the patient.

The Biden administration asked the Supreme Court to intervene after the US Court of Appeals allowed the Fifth Circuit to stand on a number of limitations in the Texas ruling, even as it said it would allow the pills to remain on the market.

In Friday’s order, Judges Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr.

Judge Thomas did not provide reasons, but Judge Alito noted that the Fifth Circuit has already narrowed down the more remote aspects of Texas rule. He added that the FDA and the manufacturer of the branded version of mifepristone, Danco Laboratories, “have not shown that they are likely to suffer irreparable harm” as the case continues in appeals court.

Judge Alito expressed skepticism about the FDA’s claims that regulatory “chaos” would ensue if the lower court’s ruling went into effect. Referring to a competing case brought by Democratic state attorneys general in Washington state, which is seen as a direct challenge to the case in Texas, he accused the FDA of taking advantage of the court system to implement “the desired policy while evading both necessary cases.” Agency Actions and Judicial Review”.

Advertisement

This is most likely not the final word from the judges. After the Fifth Circuit hears the appeal, the case will likely go back to the Supreme Court.

None of the justices appointed by President Donald J. Trump have publicly objected.

The court’s decision is, at least temporarily, a victory for the Biden administration.

President Biden welcomed the decision, saying that “the administration will continue to advocate for the Food and Drug Administration’s independent expert authority to review, approve, and regulate a broad range of prescription drugs.”

He added that the Texas ruling “would have undermined the FDA’s medical judgment and endangered women’s health.”

Advertisement

A spokesperson for the Food and Drug Administration declined to comment.

The reaction of the plaintiffs — a coalition of anti-abortion groups and many doctors — has been muted.

The fight will continue, said Eric Baptiste, senior counsel at the Coalition for Defense of Freedom, a conservative legal organization representing the coalition.

“The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must be held accountable for the damage it has caused to the health of countless women and girls and the rule of law by failing to examine the riskiness of the chemical abortion drug regimen and to remove every meaningful safeguard, even allowing mail-order abortions,” said Mr. Baptist. .

After the Supreme Court struck down a constitutional right to abortion in June, political and legal battles have turned to medical abortion, a two-drug regimen usually used in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.

Advertisement

The first drug, mifepristone, inhibits the reproductive hormone progesterone, and the second, misoprostol, taken a day or two later, stimulates contractions and helps the uterus expel its contents.

More than five million women have used mifepristone to terminate their pregnancies in the United States, and dozens of other countries have approved the drug for use.

The case reached the judges after a quick and tangled battle over the legal status of the grain.

In November, plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in the Amarillo Circuit of the Texas federal court system, ensuring that the case would be brought before a single judge: Matthew J.

Justice Kaksmarek, a Trump appointee, is a longtime opponent of abortion who joined the platform after working for the First Liberty Institute, a conservative legal group focused on religious freedom issues.

Advertisement

The coalition that brought the lawsuit, the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, argued that the Food and Drug Administration improperly approved the birth control pill in 2000 and that mifepristone is unsafe. The agency has strongly disputed these claims, citing studies showing that serious complications are rare and that less than 1 percent of patients require hospitalization.

This month, Judge Kaksmarek, in an interim ruling, declared the FDA’s approval of the drug invalid and gave both parties a week to seek emergency relief before the decision took effect.

Less than an hour later, a federal judge in Washington state, Thomas O. Rice, appointed by President Barack Obama, issued a conflicting ruling in a separate lawsuit involving mifepristone. Judge Rice blocked the FDA from limiting the availability of birth control pills to the 17 states and the District of Columbia, which were parties to that lawsuit.

Competing rulings mean the matter is almost certain to go to the Supreme Court.

The FDA immediately appealed Judge Kaksmarek’s decision, and a divided panel of three Fifth Circuit judges, in New Orleans, upheld the agency’s approval of the drug, ensuring that mifepristone would remain on the market.

Advertisement

But the commission raised several barriers to access, sided in part with Judge Kacsmarek, while the suit went through the courts. It blocked a series of steps the Food and Drug Administration has taken since 2016 to increase the availability and distribution of the drug, such as allowing it to be mailed and prescribed by non-physician medical providers.

Adam Liptak And Christina Jewett Contribute to the preparation of reports.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Ohio Senate Candidate Calls for Reparations for Whites…But There’s a Catch | Expert portal

Published

on

By

As liberal states and municipalities explore the idea of ​​reparations for African Americans, one US Senate candidate in Ohio running to unseat Sherrod Brown (D-OH) has floated reparations for white Americans, but not all white Americans.

100 percent fed up Reports – Bernie Moreno, owner of a chain of auto dealerships across the Midwest, He called for compensation for the descendants of Union soldiers who died during the Civil War.

Moreno noted that such a thing as the death of white soldiers to free black slaves only happened in the United States.

Advertisement

He is the second Republican to throw his name into the hat for the GOP nomination for the 2024 Senate race, and Ohio Senator Matt Dolan is also vying for the nomination.

Moreno previously ran for Senate in 2022, and spent a large amount of his money promoting his campaign, but dropped out after meeting with former President Donald Trump, who ended up endorsing Sen. J.D. Vance (R) in the primaries.

Moreno describes himself as an “externally conservative” and will once again be able to finance a large portion of his campaign himself.

New York Post reports

Bernie Moreno, a Republican looking to challenge US Senator Sherrod Brown, has suggested that the white descendants of Northern Civil War soldiers should be eligible for some form of compensation.

“We stand on the shoulders of giants, right? We stand on the shoulders of people like John Adams, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, George Washington. That this group of people took over the greatest empire in history. They said no, we’re not going to stand with this. And he won, Moreno told supporters at a campaign event in Buckeye State this week.

“That same group of people later, the whites, died to liberate the blacks. This has never happened in human history before, but it has happened here in America. This isn’t taught much in schools, is it?” he added.

“They make it sound like America is a broken, racist country. You name a country that did that: that freed slaves, that died to do it. You know, they talk about reparations. Where are the reparations for people in the North who died to save black lives?”



Source link

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Politics

Senator calls on Republicans for a concerted campaign to ban abortion

Published

on

By

Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minnesota) has made clear that the abortion bans being enacted in red states are not unilateral decisions but part of a concerted Republican plan to take away health care freedom.

video:

Advertisement

Smith told CNN’s Jim Acosta when asked about the Supreme Court’s suspension of the abortion pill ban ruling:

I worked at Planned Parenthood where I saw women every day making good decisions about their health care, not needing politicians to tell them what to do for people living in countries where abortion is still protected, and that freedom is still protected. They can know that, for now, they will still have access to abortion medication.

But as your article before I came showed, women in states across the country are losing that access. And this is not happening just now. This is part of a concerted campaign by this Republican party to strip that freedom away and I worked at Planned Parenthood when I saw this long-standing effort to ban abortion and that’s really what we’re seeing and proclaiming all over the country and I think that’s what we’d see at the federal level if they had The right to vote.

Advertisement

The issue of abortion is the issue of freedom. Republicans are trying to take away from the majority of the US population the freedom to control their own bodies and make their own healthcare decisions. Every American who values ​​individual freedom should be outraged by what the Republicans are doing.

These bans are not isolated individual decisions made by state governments. Ban is a concerted campaign to effectively ban abortion in the United States. Senator Smith was right. If the Republicans controlled the government, they would ban abortion.

The media tends to treat plagiarism as individual acts, but they need to see the bigger picture. If Americans wish to remain free, they must stop those who are bent on destroying the most personal individual liberties.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending