Connect with us


Best Internet Providers in San Antonio



The Alamo, perhaps San Antonio’s most famous attraction, signifies a tale of brave, defiant loss. But this Texas city is a frontrunner regarding the speed of its broadband connections. Of the country’s top 100 cities, San Antonio was second only to Jersey City, New Jersey, for the fastest fixed internet speeds on average.

According to the latest results from the speed-testing site Ookla, which tracks city speeds based on daily tests run by customers across the US, San Antonio residents enjoy median download speeds of nearly 239 megabits per second and median uploads of approximately 23Mbps. This solidifies the San Antonio metro area in the country’s top five and ahead of kindred Texas cities like Austin, Dallas and Houston.  

What does that mean for you? If you live in the San Antonio-New Braunfels area, or plan to move there, you’ll have some zippy options, from fiber providers like AT&T and Google Fiber to reliable cable connections from Spectrum. Even if you venture beyond city limits, you should have some reasonable options available. If not, satellite providers like HughesNet and Viasat always ensure you can get your home online. But before you go that route, explore fixed wireless solutions, including 5G home internet, which made significant strides in 2022. 

Best internet providers in the Alamo City

Our pick for the best overall ISP in San Antonio is AT&T, but there was plenty of close competition. Here’s what you need to know about the best internet providers in San Antonio.


AT&T: Best overall among internet providers in San Antonio

Sarah Tew/CNET

  • Price range: $55 to $180 a month
  • Speed range: 300 to 5,000Mbps
  • Highlights: Unlimited data, no contracts, equipment included
  • Special offers: $100 to $150 gift card if you sign up online

AT&T Internet has a strong presence in the San Antonio area. Fiber availability reaches most of the city, including Alamo Heights, Blue Star, Columbia Heights, Five Points, Prospect Hill and other neighborhoods. Other AT&T serviceable areas will feature the company’s DSL service, which doesn’t compare. Don’t believe me? AT&T said so, essentially — it publicly announced a goal of halving its copper coverage by 2025

But back to AT&T Fiber. With symmetrical download and upload speeds, it offers five plans — 300Mbps, 500Mbps, 1,000Mbps, 2,000Mbps and 5,000Mbps. Additionally, customers get unlimited data, no term agreements and equipment included in your monthly fee. That’s an excellent value.

Read our AT&T home internet review.



You’re receiving price alerts for AT&T Home Internet

Google Fiber: Best fiber service among internet providers in San Antonio

Sarah Tew/CNET

  • Price range: $70 to $100 a month
  • Speed range: 1,000 to 2,000Mbps
  • Highlights: Unlimited data, no contracts, equipment included 

I know what you may be thinking. Didn’t I just sing the praises of AT&T? Yes, but not all San Antonio customers within AT&T’s reach get access to AT&T Fiber. Some still only get DSL service, which features top download speeds of around 100Mbps, and in some cases, maxes out at around 25Mbps, the bare minimum to be considered broadband speed.

On the other hand, if you can access Google Fiber, you know what you will get — 100% fiber-optic internet service with symmetrical download and upload speeds. That consistency led Google Fiber to the title of the fastest fixed broadband provider in the city, featuring median download speeds of nearly 282Mbps. 

Google Fiber features just two plan options — 1,000Mbps and 2,000Mbps. Each boasts fast internet speeds, unlimited data, no term agreements and all equipment included. Is Google Fiber cheap? No. But in terms of value, it’s tough to beat: The $70 per month gigabit plan has a cost per Mbps of 7 cents, while the two gig plan ($100 monthly) is an even better 5 cents per Mbps. 

Google Fiber can’t match the wide availability of some other providers in the greater San Antonio metro area. Still, within city limits, you should be able to find it in Balcones Heights, Castle Hills, Encino, Leon Valley, St. Mary’s University, Shavano Park and Stone Oak. 

Read our Google Fiber home internet review.



Spectrum: Best availability for internet providers in San Antonio

Sarah Tew/CNET

  • Price range: $50 to $90 a month
  • Speed range: 300 to 940Mbps
  • Highlights: Simple pricing, no contracts, no data caps, free access to nationwide Wi-Fi hotspots
  • Special offers: Bundle discounts, free Peacock Premium for up to 12 months

Charter Communications’ broadband service reaches more households in the San Antonio metropolitan area than even AT&T does. They’re essentially even in San Antonio proper, but Spectrum stretches out more significantly into neighboring New Braunfels. Why might that matter? It could come in handy if you need to move within the region and don’t want the hassle of changing your ISP. 

Spectrum is an appealing choice — especially for a cable internet provider — because of its straightforward approach. There are three plan options — 300, 500 or 940Mbps download speed — and no data caps. Spectrum also includes the monthly modem costs but charges an additional $5 a month for a Wi-Fi router. As a cable provider, its upload speeds will only reach 35Mbps (far short of fiber internet), but customers can count on greater reliability compared to DSL and satellite internet options.


Read our Spectrum home internet review.


You’re receiving price alerts for Spectrum Internet


T-Mobile Home Internet: Best fixed wireless option among internet providers in San Antonio

Sarah Tew/CNET

  • Price range: $50 a month ($30 for eligible T-Mobile voice customers)
  • Speed range: 33 to 182Mbps
  • Highlights: No data cap, no contracts, all-inclusive price (no additional fee for equipment or extra charges)
  • Special offers: 15-day Test Drive, Price Lock guarantee, free one-year subscription to Paramount Plus, $10 off per month on Philo TV for a year, T-Mobile Tuesdays (weekly perks)

T-Mobile made some significant strides in 2022 with its 5G internet service. It ended the year with over 2 million subscribers, availability to over 40 million people and an eye on continued expansion. Most impressively, T-Mobile says that nearly a third of its customers are from rural areas, so if you’re in an area where DSL or satellite have been your only choices, T-Mobile Home Internet is a very intriguing option.

Though the greater San Antonio-New Braunfels area is included in T-Mobile’s coverage list for Texas, confirm it’s available at your location. Plug in your address (or your mobile phone number, if you’re already a T-Mobile customer) on the T-Mobile Home Internet site to make certain.

Read our T-Mobile Home Internet overview.



Internet providers in San Antonio overview

Provider Internet technology Monthly price range Speed range Monthly equipment costs Data cap Contract CNET review score
Astound Broadband/Grande Cable $26-$60 400-1,200Mbps $15 (skippable) None None 7
AT&T DSL/fiber $55-$180 10-5,000Mbps None None None 7.4
Frontier DSL/fiber $55-$165 10-5,000Mbps None None None 6
Google Fiber Fiber $70-$100 1,000-2,000Mbps None None None 7.4
Spectrum Cable $50-$90 300-940Mbps Free modem; $5 router None None 7.2
T-Mobile Home Internet Fixed wireless $50 ($30 with Magenta MAX discount) 33-182Mbps None None None 7.4

Show More (1 items)

Shop Providers

All other available San Antonio residential internet providers 

You can find many broadband options across the San Antonio-New Braunfels metropolitan region. Availability is dependent on your address, of course, but you may be able to find some appealing choices beyond our highlighted picks. 

  • Astound Broadband/Grande: You’ll be hard-pressed to find better starting rates in the region than what you’ll get from this cable internet provider. In San Antonio, Astound’s cheapest plan is a 400Mbps tier for $26 per month. At 7 cents per Mbps, that’s excellent value for a provider’s opening offering. Most ISPs, especially cable providers, will have a starting plan of around 50 to 100Mbps. If you’re looking for speed, Astound’s fastest plan — 1,200Mbps — is also one of the best values in the city, ringing in at 5 cents per Mbps, or $60 monthly. It also comes with a free year of HBO Max. All Astound plans come with a two-year price guarantee but beware of a potentially steep increase after that.
  • Frontier: You can’t get Frontier anywhere within San Antonio city limits. But the provider’s mix of DSL and fiber service is an option to the southeast, specifically in the suburb of Floresville. Similar to our guidance on AT&T service, you’ll want to check your address to see if you can get fiber service rather than DSL. Frontier Fiber — with symmetrical plans of 500Mbps, gigabit or 2Gbps speeds — is an appealing choice. But you could probably do better if you get the slower, less reliable DSL.
  • Ranch Wireless: This rural wireless provider covers markets throughout south-central Texas. While it doesn’t operate in San Antonio, it does reach many towns on the outskirts, including New Braunfels in the northeast, Adkins and Calaveras in the east, and several rural locations to the south, including Campbellton, Charlotte, Jourdanton and Pleasonton. Ranch Wireless features plans ranging from $30 per month for 1Mbps download and 30GB of data to $120 monthly for unlimited data and 25Mbps download speed.
  • Rise Broadband: This fixed wireless provider offers internet service on the far east and upper northwest portion of San Antonio. It offers speeds up to 50Mbps and unlimited data too. That makes it an especially viable option for residents outside city limits, in towns like Floresville, Jourdanton, Pleasanton and San Geronimo. 
  • Satellite internet: If you live in San Antonio proper, you should have little need for satellite internet service. There are much faster (and cheaper) alternatives to be found. But suppose you’re part of the significant number of suburban and rural San Antonio-New Braunfels region residents. In that case, you might have reason to consider HughesNet or Viasat, the leading satellite broadband providers. A big drawback to both is they each require a two-year contract commitment. Elon Musk’s Starlink has them beat on that front — it nixes all term contract agreements. However, per the Starlink map, availability is short and potential customers must wait until later in 2023.
  • Verizon 5G Home Internet: This provider’s 5G fixed wireless home internet product has a higher average download speed (300Mbps) than T-Mobile Home Internet and also claims a similar all-in price that includes all equipment and fees for $50 per month (with eligible Verizon mobile customers getting a 50% discount on top of that). So why have I listed T-Mobile higher? Verizon’s coverage is strongest in metro areas, while T-Mobile flexes its muscles more capably in rural areas. That better fits the San Antonio-New Braunfels region.
Downtown San Antonio, including the riverwalk and the Tower Life Building in the distance.

Davel5957/Getty Images

San Antonio internet details at a glance

We’ve taken a bird’s eye look at the internet providers in San Antonio, but let’s get more specific about the broadband plans you can find in the Alamo City.  

Pricing for San Antonio home internet service 

The average starting price for home internet in San Antonio is approximately $48 per month. That considers the promo prices you’ll get at the beginning, not the standard rates you’ll get hit with a year later. $48 monthly puts San Antonio toward the higher end of markets CNET has covered so far, including Brooklyn ($36 a month), Los Angeles ($38 a month), Denver ($39 per month), San Francisco ($40 a month), New York City ($41 per month), Seattle ($42 monthly), Dallas and Philadelphia (both near $43 per month), Houston ($45 monthly), Phoenix ($46 per month), Atlanta ($47 monthly), Orlando ($48 a month) and Charlotte, Chicago, Las VegasSan Diego and St. Louis (all approximately $50 monthly). 

Cheap internet options in the River City

Although the lowest starting price in San Antonio is Rise Broadband and its 25Mbps plan for $25 a month, the best value is Astound’s 400Mbps plan at $26 monthly, only a dollar more than Rise’s opening bid but exponentially faster. 

Sticking with the topic of value, most providers we’ve listed are also participating in the Federal Communication Commission’s Affordable Connectivity Program. It provides a $30 monthly discount to eligible, low-income homes for affordable, high-speed internet. If you qualify, the ACP can be used towards any internet plan from participating providers and in some cases, you might be able to get internet service for free. 

What are the cheapest internet plans in San Antonio?

Show More (6 items)

Shop Providers


Internet speeds in San Antonio

As I mentioned earlier, the River City is the fastest broadband city in Texas and one of the country’s fastest cities regarding median download internet speeds. 

Download speeds

San Antonio – 161 Mbps

TX – 152 Mbps

US – 133 Mbps


Upload speeds

San Antonio – 78 Mbps

TX – 67 Mbps

US – 46 Mbps

*Data sourced from M-LAB speed tests taken by real users in San Antonio.

Fastest internet providers in San Antonio

The city’s impressive internet speed numbers are undoubtedly buoyed by the fiber internet service of AT&T (which features a 5Gbps plan in some areas of the city), Frontier Fiber (which also boasts a 5 gig plan) and Google Fiber, whose cheapest (and slowest) plan is a full gigabit.  


What are the fastest internet plans in San Antonio?

Provider Max download speed Max upload speed Starting price Data cap Contract
Frontier Fiber 5 Gig 5,000Mbps 5,000Mbps $165 None None
AT&T Fiber 5000 5,000Mbps 5,000Mbps $180 None None
AT&T Fiber 2000 2,000Mbps 2,000Mbps $110 None None
Frontier Fiber 2 Gig 2,000Mbps 2,000Mbps $110 None None
Astound Broadband/Grande 1,200Mbps 50Mbps $60 None None
AT&T Fiber 1000 1,000Mbps 1,000Mbps $80 None None
Frontier Fiber 1 Gig 1,000Mbps 1,000Mbps $80 None None
Rise Broadband 1,000Mbps 1,000Mbps $100 None None
Astound Broadband/Grande 940Mbps 50Mbps $50 None None
Spectrum Internet Gig 940Mbps 35Mbps $90 None None

Show More (5 items)

Shop Providers

What’s the bottom line on San Antonio internet providers?

We mention it often in our CNET home internet reviews, but it bears repeating: All things being equal, fiber internet service trumps other internet connection types every time. However, what matters is what’s available at your address. You’re in great shape if you can get AT&T Fiber or Google Fiber at your home. If not, there are still affordable cable options — like Astound Broadband and Spectrum —  that’ll get you plenty of speed and decent reliability. 

Internet providers in San Antonio FAQs

Is there fiber internet service in San Antonio?


Yes. AT&T is the most widely available fiber provider in the area, but ensure you’re serviceable for its fiber service, not DSL. Google Fiber is also available within city limits. Some suburban areas might also have access to Frontier Fiber and Rise Broadband’s fiber plans, though these will be much more scarce.

Who has the cheapest internet in San Antonio?

Rise Broadband boasts the cheapest internet plan in San Antonio at $25 per month for 25Mbps download speed. That narrowly beats Astound Broadband’s 400Mbps plan at $26 a month, but that’s a much better value at 7 cents per Mbps to Rise Broadband’s $1 per Mbps.


Sticking with overall value, Astound’s 1,200Mbps plan, at $60 monthly, is a great deal at 5 cents per Mbps. That’s matched by Google Fiber’s 2 Gig plan, which also features 5 cents per Mbps but is $40 more per month. The only other Alamo City providers able to provide a better cost value are AT&T’s Fiber 5000 offering (which at $180 per month isn’t exactly cheap, mind you) and Frontier’s 5 Gig plan (slightly cheaper at $165 monthly) which both feature a cost per Mbps of under 4 cents. 

What provider offers the fastest internet service in San Antonio?

Based solely on download speed, AT&T and Frontier offer the fastest available plans at 5Gbps. However, speed test data says Google Fiber is the fastest provider in San Antonio regarding median download speeds, at nearly 282Mbps. That information comes from Ookla, a company that quarterly ranks all ISPs across the country based on customer-run data.


Source link



Smartphone scams are dead – Android Authority




Robert Triggs/Android Authority

Ten years ago, the 2013 Samsung Galaxy S4 was a technological marvel. Android phones had only been around for a few years at that point, and it seemed like the Galaxy S4 could do a lot despite its small size. As consumers, we were delighted. So much so, that to this day the Galaxy S4 remains the best-selling Android phone of all time, with over 80 million units sold.

However, that was ten years ago – an eternity in the tech world. Things have changed dramatically since then. The smartphone tricks we saw in the Galaxy S4 — like the Smart Scroll, which let you scroll the contents of your screen by moving your head up or down — would be completely ridiculous to see in a 2023 phone.

Today, smartphones are ubiquitous gadgets, not technical marvels. Consumers are using their phones more than ever before, yes, but that has faded the shine. Modern smartphone buyers don’t want gimmicks. They want a phone that fixes the basics and hides in the background.


In 2023, if a smartphone manufacturer thinks that some cool new trick will be the backbone that sells its phones, it will be in a world of disappointment. Not only will consumers care, but investing in research and development for this trick could do more harm than good.

What are the tricks of the smartphone?

Google Pixel 4 XL Long Range 2 review

Oliver Cragg / Android Authority

The term “gimmick” can be used broadly. In general, when it comes to smartphones, we think of gimmicks as features that are only applicable to very specific situations, appeal to a limited subset of users, or offer no real value (or some combination thereof).

One of history’s most egregious examples of smartphone scams was the Soli radar system in the Google Pixel 4 and Pixel 4 XL. Soli was a set of front-facing radar sensors that could track your hand movements. They let you do things like pause the music simply by waving your hand near the screen. While Soli performed as advertised, consumers simply didn’t care, and the Pixel 4 series was the biggest failure in Pixel history.

If your star phone feature only appeals to a few people, it’s probably a gimmick.


A more recent example came with the OnePlus 10 Pro last year. This phone was equipped with an ultra-high resolution camera with a field of view of 150 degrees. This was essentially a fish-eye lens, creating highly distorted images that looked unreal. Although software trickery helped fix images in post-processing, critics and consumers alike saw no need for such a bizarre lens. OnePlus eliminated the lens on this year’s OnePlus 10T and OnePlus 11.

Here are some other smartphone tricks we’ve seen:

  • foreign matter: OnePlus recently announced the Jupiter Rock Edition of the OnePlus 11. It has a back that is basically made of rock. Who asked for this?
  • Macro lenses: While a great telephoto lens can be an interesting addition to a solid lens collection, most of the time that’s not the case. Often, OEMs will throw in cheap 2MP macro lenses to make a phone look more premium than it is. In other words, the thought process is that more lenses = better cameras, which consumers are no longer fooled by.
  • Super fast charging: While it’s crazy to see 240W charging speeds on a smartphone (that’s fast enough to charge from empty to full in about ten minutes), who really needs that? These speeds are also said to be detrimental to the health of the battery, thus shortening the life of your phone.
  • Cooling systems: Lenovo Legion Duel 2 – a gaming phone – had a cooling fan built into it. While this is practical for a phone designed for gamers, it also made the phone unwieldy, prevented an IP rating, and made wireless charging impossible. It solved one problem at the expense of basic smartphone features. Likewise, OnePlus’ latest concept phone has a liquid cooling system that didn’t even work.

These gimmicks don’t help sell phones because they don’t give us what we really want: a great overall experience.

But what about phones in specific niches, like rugged phones? Is the rugged phone a gimmick? I’d argue it isn’t, but they also don’t sell in the numbers we’d see with something like the Galaxy S series. These phones exist for specific purposes for a specific consumer, so they get a special pass.

The current smartphone successes are all the evidence you need

Google Pixel 7 Pro camera housing

Robert Triggs/Android Authority

We know why smartphone manufacturers invest in these kinds of tricks. They obviously think they’ll help sell the phones or, at the very least, help their products stand out from the crowd. This is an odd strategy because the most successful phones tend to be relatively gimmick-free.


Here in the US, the iPhone is by far the most popular smartphone. For the first time ever, Apple has more than 50% of the market in the US, leaving the other half to Android OEMs (mostly Samsung). The iPhone doesn’t have a lot of tricks. One could argue that Dynamic Island is a gimmick, but it’s one that consumers seem to enjoy, so it doesn’t really count.

Unsurprisingly, the most successful phones are also some of the most gimmick-free.

In second place, Samsung’s Galaxy S series also stands out as being gimmick-free. The Galaxy S23 Ultra’s S Pen may be a bit gimmicky for some. However, it’s also incredibly popular and a calling card for a premium Galaxy experience, so we’ll be happy to let this feature slip. Despite this, the Galaxy S23 and Galaxy S23 Plus are pretty boring with how functional and no-nonsense they are. And guess what? The Galaxy S23 line is selling better than the Galaxy S22 line.

Of course, we can’t forget about Google’s pixel font. The Google Pixel 7 Pro doesn’t have any weird tricks up its sleeve, and was voted the best Android phone of 2022 by both Android Authority And our readers. It’s interesting that when Google gave up the tricks, it ended up selling more phones than ever before.

Obviously, phones can reach consumers without gimmicks. However, Dynamic Island and the S Pen show that there is still room for fun and doing things differently.


However, phones can still be fun

None Phone Number 1 graphic on the back

Oliver Cragg / Android Authority

We’ve already discussed plenty of examples of stupid smartphone tricks that get in the way of a good experience. However, some tricks work.

Take Nothing Phone 1, for example. The lights on the back of the device — officially known as The Glyph — appear to be a ridiculous gimmick. Once you use the phone, you will realize that it is actually an Android smartphone with a strange light show added. In other words, The Glyph can be ignored, and you’ll still get a great Android experience with a very fair cost-to-value ratio.

I’m not against the trick. There is plenty of room for fun features.

This is a great example of how doing tricks properly can be beneficial. Nothing crammed into The Glyph comes at the expense of wireless charging, a premium feel, or a decent camera system. Use the trick as a light garnish on top of a satisfying meal. It’s a beautiful detail that highlights an already well-done dish.


Google’s Magic Eraser is another example of a gimmick that works. With the Pixel’s camera experience already being one of the best (if not the best) phone camera experiences available, the Magic Eraser feature exists as a useful tool for people looking to fix otherwise great photos. It was not Need Magic Eraser, but it’s practical and fun when you want it to be.

That’s all to say that smartphones don’t need to be boring. There’s plenty of room for fun gimmicks, cool aesthetics, and thought-provoking twists. But gimmicks can’t be the phone’s selling point. They must be side players.

OEMs will need to shift focus — or dump

Lenovo Legion Duel 2 1

Luke Pollack / Android Authority

Remember Lenovo Legion Duel 2, the phone with an integrated cooling system? Unfortunately, this trick didn’t work out very well for Lenovo. Recently, the company confirmed this Android Authority He shut down the Legion’s smartphone arm.

We’ve also mentioned OnePlus several times in this article. This company is not doing well either. There is a rumor that it could pull out along with sister brand OPPO from the European market either this year or in 2024. OnePlus has lost all carrier partnerships in the US, and its latest flagship — the OnePlus 11 — hasn’t gotten strong reviews. Again, tricks don’t seem to have helped here.


What do you think of smartphone scams?

146 votes

This all supports my central argument: scams don’t sell phones. We’ve settled on wanting phones that excel at the essentials: battery life, camera, screen, usability, performance, and so on. I could also argue that design is just as important here, though it’s more subjective than something like battery life. What doesn’t matter are the extra lenses, radar systems, cooling fans, rock-solid backboards, and all the other tricks we’ve seen.

Companies that are stuck in 2013 and think cool gimmicks will sell a lot of phones will need to wake up from that dream sooner rather than later. Apple and Samsung eat your lunch and do so without relying on gimmicks. Make your phones awesome at a competitive price and we’ll buy it. Simply.

Source link

Continue Reading


All of my favorite games this year are old




I also installed the original version Final Fantasy, the game that debuted when I was three years old, on Sony’s most advanced console yet, I came to a realization: everything I played this year was outdated. Between remakes, new releases, and vintage collections, there’s been a flood of nostalgia. I personally welcomed it.

These kinds of releases aren’t new, of course. What was different during the early months was the huge amount of classic releases. Two of the biggest movies so far this year – dead space And Resident Evil 4 – is a remake of titles from more than a decade ago. Both are slick, slick updates that don’t look out of place among recent big-budget releases, but part of what makes them so attractive is how straightforward they are. There are no open worlds filled with endless quests or live service items to keep you coming back. And most of these design decisions date back to their ages, as these games were made at a completely different time with very different expectations. In my review of Resident Evil 4 A remake, I called it “a video game like this,” and I meant that as a compliment.

Advance Wars 1 + 2: Re-Boot Camp.
Image: Nintendo

But they can also be a lot of work, frequently setting in to be all-consuming experiences that keep you hooked and never let go. Oh I love Fortnite Like everyone else, but that’s not all I want from my video games. Whether it is as complicated as RE4 Or simply put a scene from the opera Final Fantasy VI On my PS5, these games have returned a simplicity and focus I often find missing from their modern contemporaries. vampire And Final Fantasy They are very different experiences, but they give me the same feeling of a whole solo journey that I’m supposed to play through from start to finish. Same goes for the other old games I’ve been playing.


Playing—and in many cases, replaying—these games was an exercise in reminding myself of what could be so great about a medium. The largest modern versions tend to imitate each other to the point where they are almost indistinguishable from one another. That’s what makes a lot of indie releases so exciting, and likewise, what keeps me coming back for all these new releases of old games — so it’s good to me that this trend shows no sign of stopping.

Source link

Continue Reading


NBCUniversal CEO Jeff Shell leaves Comcast due to ‘improper conduct’




NBCUniversal CEO Jeff Shell will leave Comcast, effective immediately. The telecom giant made the surprising announcement in a brief press release Released on Sunday. After an investigation prompted by a complaint of improper conduct, Comcast says it has reached a “joint” decision with Shell that he should resign from his position.

“Today is my last day as CEO of NBCUniversal. I had an inappropriate relationship with a woman in the company, which I deeply regret,” Shell said in a joint statement. “I am really sorry that I left my colleagues at Comcast and NBCUniversal, they are the most talented people in this field and the opportunity to work with them over the past 19 years has been a privilege.”

Comcast has not named a successor to Shell. in a note obtained diverseComcast CEO Brian Roberts and President Mike Kavanagh told employees they were “disappointed” to share the news. “We built this company on a culture of integrity. Nothing is more important than how we treat each other. You must count on your leaders to create a safe and respectful workplace,” they wrote. “When our principles and policies are violated, we will always move quickly to take appropriate action, as we have done here.”


Shell joined Comcast in 2004. He became CEO of NBCUniversal in 2020. That same year, he oversaw the launch of Peacock. Shell leaves NBCUniversal without making the streaming service profitable. At the beginning of the year, Comcast told investors that it had done so Added five million paid subscribers During the last three months of 2022. However, over the same period, the company lost nearly $1 billion while operating the service.

Source link

Continue Reading